Re: A86: An idea for an ASM program
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: An idea for an ASM program
On Mon, 04 May 1998 21:00:01 -0400 Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>
writes:
>
>no, the "0" before it puts something in Ans. Also, if you were to use
and op5!!!
-josh
>a
>function with parameters, you would run into several problems:
>(a) the user would have to install the token before the basic program
>would
>work.
>(b) the token may conflict with other asaps (stat, fin, trig, asm,
>etc...) and
>if it is installed automatically, that would cause a problem.
>
>Calling the asm program from the basic program with an Asm(beep) is
>really the
>best way. The only time user tokens come in handy is when you want to
>add
>functionality to the user end of the os...
>
>Kevin Buck wrote:
>
>> and because that routine is merely calling an ASM program (If I
>understand
>> it correctly), and you would have that to worry with, and probably
>only have
>> one type of sound. I don't know how it could be accomplished, but
>it would
>> be very nice to have built into the I/O menu.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
>> To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
>> Date: Sunday, May 03, 1998 8:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: A86: An idea for an ASM program
>>
>> >
>> >Because it looks better ... and it's easier to read parameters :-)
>> >
>> >Kirk Meyer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Why does it have to be a callable function? Why not something
>like
>> >>
>> >> 0:Asm(sound
>> >>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Follow-Ups:
References: