RE: A86: Windows 98
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A86: Windows 98
>From owner-assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Sat
Jun 6 11:14:49 1998
>Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
>Received: by towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (VMailer, from userid
507)
> id 44108CAD4F; Sat, 06 Jun 1998 20:14:37 +0200 (CEST)
>Message-Id: <v02110106b19f28724417@[192.168.1.250]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 10:10:22 -0700
>To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
>From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)
>Subject: RE: A86: Windows 98
>Sender: owner-assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
>Errors-To: assembly-86-errors@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
>Only 3 times? Wow!
>
>>The beta had like barely and bugs and has crashed on me like 3 times,
and
>>then when was when I was messing with a broken CD-ROM drive (didn't
know
>>that when I plugged it in). It is like 200% more reliable than Win
95.
>>
>>ViRtUaL mAlFuNcTiOn
>>>
>>> > Win98=Win95+Display Manager+IE 4
>>>
>>> -some old bugs+plenty of new bugs
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
3 times is 3 times too many for me. If the OS is so fucked in the head
it crashes on account of a CD-ROM, that should tell you something.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com