Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 18:54:23 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <f255035b.3574819d@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


ComAsYuAre@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 6/2/98 5:42:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> ahmedre@bellsouth.net writes:
>
> > Hey,
> >      Would someone clarify to me 100% .. what is wrong w/my Calendar
> program?
> >  Should 2000 be 29 days or is it correct as 28?  If it is incorrect, then is
> >  all 400x years [0,400,800,...] have 29 days whereas all other 100 years
> have
> >  28?   Can someone tell me for sure?  I will probably also add saving
> feature
> >  in the next version... Thanks for any help.
>
> leap years are in years divisible by 4 and not divisible by 100

2000 is a leap year and 2000 is divisible by 100.  If a year is divisible by 100
and not 400, then it is not a leap year.

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

References:

Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..

From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com

Prev: Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
Next: Re: A86: Re: PutSprite
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread