Re: A86: batt checker

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A86: batt checker
From: "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 15:36:23 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

>
>In a message dated 12/2/98 04:59:33 Eastern Standard Time,
>assets@eden.rutgers.edu writes:
>
>> try an acurracy of about 15 t-states! the only problem with this is the
>>  unknown timing of in f,(c); does someone want to test this?  (I'm unable
to
>>  link)
>
>
>are you saying that you can do in and out with all registers? that's really
>useful.  don't see why zilog kept everyone in the dark about this stuff.

They probably either didn't think it was useful, or didn't know about it.
There are hundreds of undocumented opcodes, but most them aren't worth using
because they do the same thing as another and take up an extra byte or
something like that.

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: batt checker

From: Cassady Roop <croop@oregontrail.net>