Re: A86: Re: Frogger

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Frogger
From: "Mark Zimmerman" <gramdon@mail2.theonramp.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 22:34:28 -0500
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

>MCFLY, the dude said ANY suggestions and i think that sound would >be a
>valid addition, as valid as adding sound to any game you thought >was
>cool, right?

Well, then my suggestion is not to add sound.


----------
> From: TreyJazz <joemama@minot.com>
> To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A86: Re: Frogger
> Date: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 10:30 PM
> 
> Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> > 
> > somebody suggested sound. Wouldn't that take up more memory. It's
frogger.
> > It's cool enough as it is. It doesn't need sound. BTW, longer levels
and
> > more levels would be really cool. What do you plan on doing in
Grayscale?
> 
> MCFLY, the dude said ANY suggestions and i think that sound would be a
> valid addition, as valid as adding sound to any game you thought was
> cool, right? And yes the second program will be bigger because thats
> what sequals are sposed to be! bigger and better, it doesnt really
> matter if its bigger than the first because the first isnt that big
> anyway.

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: Re: Frogger

From: TreyJazz <joemama@minot.com>