Re: A86: Penguins Level (was A86: Standards)


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: Penguins Level (was A86: Standards)



Better yet - why not try to name the levels illegaly (is that the term?) so
they are not seen in the program list from the TI OS, and also add the
returnbyte and the other two bytes so it can be recognized by ASM shells as
a level.

Just some thoughts,
Andres
----------
> From: Alan Bailey <bailela@charlie.cns.iit.edu>
> To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A86: Standards
> Date: Sunday, August 03, 1997 7:49 PM
> 
> >I never thought about a indicator when I made it, and now its to late to
> >turn back because there's 18 worlds out.  Any one have any ideas of what
> >I could do?
> > 
> >Bill
> >
> >
> 
> just add this to the beginning:
> 
> 	.db $C9         ;ret, so if it's run, it doesn't screw up
> 	.db $FF,$80     ;then some kind of indicator, one or two bytes
> 
> 
> To the beginners on this list - 
> 	I know Dan Eble, Bill Nagel, and I all had previous experience with one
of
> TI's other calculators.  I think James Yopp did too.  We might take it
for
> granted sometimes.
> 
> Don't feel intimidated.  Feel free to ask questions.  If you want to
learn,
> I'd say the best thing right now is Jimmy Mardell's ZShell school.  The
> link is at ticalc.org on the 85 page.  
> 
> I'm also going to fully comment the source to kollums sometime soon, so
you
> can learn from that.
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>  Alan Bailey            mailto:bailela@charlie.cns.iit.edu
>  IRC:Abalone                     Web:nowhere at the moment
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>