Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
From: BSharp81@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 13:03:12 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org


In a message dated 8/14/98 10:00:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, BSharp81@aol.com
writes:

> While I think that you ahve a valid point, I have my own thought on this
>  matter. I currently don't own an e2 for 2 reasons:
>  1. I don't quite have the money to get one
>  2. (Most importantly) what can I use all of that space for
>  
>  If there is a OS that supports the e2 and uses more of it's space and
>  capabilities. I would definently buy it. I think other people might agree 
> with
>  this and a lack of use for all of that mem could be holding them back. Not
>  many people had personal computers when they hit the market, but now they 
> are
>  extremely possible. I believe that the e2 would increase in popularity if
an

I meant popular, not possible, sorry about that. :)

>  OS was created only for the e2 and used it capabilities and functions.
>  
>  Greg Sharp
>

Prev: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
Next: Re: A85: return of OS hardware
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread