Re: A85: Shells and games
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A85: Shells and games
Pardon me all to bits for making a suggestion to everyone, I personally
like Usgard but i never as the message announcing 1.0 and Andy's page was
never updated until version 1.1 two days ago. i ask because I want so
feed back from other people about the idea....If you just go and make a
shell in you own ideals and you think it is the best one in the world
that's fine but if everyone else hates it what good is it.
*_*_*_*_*_*_ more stuff in the quotes from me *_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:02:04 -0500 Terry Peng <tpeng@geocities.com>
writes:
>Nicholas C Anderson wrote:
>> >Excuse me, but the shell you describe as the "one last shell"
>matches
>> >Usgard quite much... it has two versions, LITE and STANDARD, it's
>very
>> >easy to use (the base version is - you can never remove all
>> >complications
>> >if you want different versions of something)
>>
>> Version 1.0 of Usgard??? if so I need to know where to find it...
>Ess's
>> page is not updated then, If so then great!!! Are libs still needed
>for
>> the simpler shells or has that been done away with??? If the
>answers
>> are true then START MAKING MORE GAMES FOR USGARD PLEASE
>> it has been a long time since I have seen a release of a truely
>awesome
>> game for the 85 released from this list or announced to us (I love
>to
>> try out new games and programs so let the list know when you release
>> something).
>
>Here's an original idea: make your OWN programs!
Here's an original idea: read the message! (Understand that I don't have
the skills yet to writte my own games also SEE THAT IS MESSAGE IS A
SUGGESTION TO THE SHELL USERS AND PROGRAMMERS THE IDEA WAS TO GET FEED
BACK NOT A BUNCH OF STUPID FLAMERS!!!
>
>>
>> >I don't see how you can think Usgard is harder to use than ZShell
>4.0...
>>
>> I am only talking about the complexities generated by the Libs and
>the
>> multi shells and popup windows...simple keystokes to change
>contrast are
>> better than that control panel (please don't go pissy on my if that
>has
>> been fixed in the newest Usgard version)
>>
>> >> I ask everyone who writes shells to work as a GROUP on
>this
>> please. I make this please not only for me but the other 350
>students
>> >> who wish to have a simple way to play games in math class and
>have
>> more that 3 games.
>>
>> OK I understand big groups suck and all but there needs to be a plan
>for
>> any future shells so that they are compatible with all shells out
>> there...Games that are for just one shell are stupid because you
>lose a
>> part of you players with that shell change. In buisness you try to
>never
>> cut out a part of you consumers...
>
>Well, we aren't gaining anything when more people use our programs.
>Personally, i don't give a ---- who plays my games, and I'm sure some
>other programmers have similar feelings.
>
>If you would like to make your own shell, then good luck! But asking
>other people to do it isn't going to get much done, especially when
>Usgard is such a good shell.
>
>--
>Terry Peng <tpeng@geocities.com>
>
LOOK!!!! I'm also a programmer, (for Basic, Pascal, C++, and Java) and I
care how many people use my software. If I am going to make a program
and not want money for it I would like as many people as possible to like
and use it.
-GreenLazer@juno.com
- "I hate a Roman named Status Quo." -Ray Bradbury
- If the TI-85 was an egg, it couldn't hatch because it would
have to many shells!
Follow-Ups:
References: