Re: A85: RAM FAIL

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: RAM FAIL
From: mikep@anet-dfw.com (Michael Pearce)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 21:12:31 GMT
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970912144701.8968C-100000@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970912144701.8968C-100000@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

Certainly it was programmer error; no fault of the shell at all.  But
does anyone have a reason as to what may cause this event to occur
(how to specifically get to this error message)?

-mike

On Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:49:52 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:

>yeah, I got that a week ago for the first time. hehehe. I was also using
>Usgard but in defence of this new lovely shell, other people have
>experienced this WAY BEFORE Usgard was ever dreamed up. Also, on my calc
>the RAM FAIL message sat there for a sec or two, then the calc reset
>itself. How nice. See even TI built a calc. better then a mac. When a mac
>crashes you have to click "ok" to restart, same in Win95, but TI obviously
>made a much wiser system =) Hehe. anyway, any non-buggy program will not
>have this RAM FAIL problem in Usgard, ZShell, etc. This message only
>occurs when something REALLY wrong occurs in the asm program. There are,
>as any ASM programmer knows, MANY reasons as to why exactly this occured.
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A85: RAM FAIL

From: 82nd Deer <eviljim@megsinet.net>

References:

Re: A85: RAM FAIL

From: Will Stokes <wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu>