Re: A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question



No, you're wrong, it is 200 times per second.  I've made a fairly accurate
clock with it.

At 11:21 PM 10/25/97 -0400, you wrote:
>200 times per second?
>
>When I look at that, I question its validity.  I might be wrong but I
>don't think it's 200 times per second, especially considering that
>computers have 18.2 interrupts each second (this can be temporarily
>changed).  I think 200 is too high, maybe you meant 20 but considering
>we're dealing with a calclulator here I do agree that even 18 interrupts
>might be too many for a calulator to handle in one second, it would
>either miss alot of what's going on trying to keep up or your calculator
>would freeze up trying to complete each interrupt
>
>Wyrmlord
>egillespie@juno.com
>
>


References: