Re: LZ: libraries
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: libraries
I intend on using the interrupt driven mouse in one of my programs. Keep
all the libraries, don't put any on the caucluator you don't want.
Jim Reardon
jim.reardon@juno.com
Viva La Mexico
http://pages.prodigy.net/eviljim/
We all come into the world the same way - naked, screaming, covered in
blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have
to end there.
On Sat, 14 Jun 1997 15:40:12 -0500 (CDT) Michael Wyman
<wyma0012@tc.umn.edu> writes:
>On Sat, 14 Jun 1997, Jonathan L Anderson wrote:
>
>> There has been some talk of removing some libraries from Usgard. My
>> question: Why? One of the reasons for having libraries is that you
>don't
>> have to put them on your calculator if you don't need them. If you
>are
>> worried about the 256 number limit on libraries, maybe the number
>should
>> be a word, or you could call libraries with their variable name
>rather
>> than library number.
>
>Some libraries just plain aren't used by _any_ programs, so why have
>them
>(e.g. the interrupt driven mouse). And as to calling the libraries by
>
>their names, that would take up too much space. Each program calling
>a
>library would need to store the name of the library or libraries which
>it
>called, and calling them would require more space/time. This would
>drop
>large amounts of mem, and would effectively remove any potential
>savings
>libraries might create.
>
>~Michael
>
>Ave. Hic adsum ad tesseras pontificis maximi Colosseo Maximo
>tollendas.
>
>
References: