Re: LZ: NASR question


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: LZ: NASR question



I'll I know is that i've ben told it can compile on some computers with
some software. Besides, why would J Xu make a mistake like that and NEVER
fix it?

                             Biya,  
                               Will Stokes
                                 8^)
           _____________________________________________________
          /                                                    /|
         /____________________________________________________/ |
        |                                                    |  |
        |                      Will Stokes                   |  |
        |                 wstokes@geocities.com              |  |
        |           wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu         |  |
        |                                                    |  |
        |                 My Personal Homepage               |  |
        |        http://www.uic.edu/~hhstokes/will.htm       |  |
        |                                                    |  |
        |             The TI-85 Calculator Center            |  |
        |   (the website I maintain and update very often)   |  |
        | http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/7360/ |  |
        |                                                    | /
        |____________________________________________________|/

On Tue, 27 May 1997, Jim Reardon wrote:

> Well, it doesn't really matter what you use to compile it, there is no
> way it can jump relative that far (it is beyond the maximum # of bytes, I
> counted :) ).
> 
> Jim Reardon
> jim.reardon@juno.com
> Viva La Mexico
> http://pages.prodigy.net/eviljim/
> We all come into the world the same way - naked, screaming, covered in
> blood.  But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have
> to end there.
> 
> 
> On Mon, 26 May 1997 22:39:06 -0500 (CDT) Will Stokes
> <wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu> writes:
> >this nasr *problem* I don't belive is actually a problem! What?! you 
> >say?
> >Well, yes, I've never gotten it to compile withouth fixing that as 
> >well
> >from jr to jp but I hear some version of tasm on certain machines 
> >(maybe
> >it was just compiling stuff on macs with whatever their inferior 
> >software
> >compiler was). but I have hear of many cases where it will compile 
> >without
> >editing. dunno :)
> >
> >                             Biya,  
> >                               Will Stokes
> >                                 8^)
> >           _____________________________________________________
> >          /                                                    /|
> >         /____________________________________________________/ |
> >        |                                                    |  |
> >        |                      Will Stokes                   |  |
> >        |                 wstokes@geocities.com              |  |
> >        |           wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu         |  |
> >        |                                                    |  |
> >        |                 My Personal Homepage               |  |
> >        |        http://www.uic.edu/~hhstokes/will.htm       |  |
> >        |                                                    |  |
> >        |             The TI-85 Calculator Center            |  |
> >        |   (the website I maintain and update very often)   |  |
> >        | http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/7360/ |  |
> >        |                                                    | /
> >        |____________________________________________________|/
> >
> >On Sun, 25 May 1997, Jim Reardon wrote:
> >
> >> There is one small bugger in the NASR.TXT on TiCalc, you need to 
> >change
> >> one of the jr's to JUMP_() statements.  I've always had to do this.  
> >I do
> >> not suggest splitting the routines though, just leave them all 
> >together.
> >> 
> >> Jim Reardon
> >> jim.reardon@juno.com
> >> Viva La Mexico
> >> http://pages.prodigy.net/eviljim/
> >> We all come into the world the same way - naked, screaming, covered 
> >in
> >> blood.  But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't 
> >have
> >> to end there.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Sun, 25 May 1997 15:34:20 -0500 James <james@superb.net> writes:
> >> >I have a question about including NASR WARP in my assembly 
> >programs.  
> >> >Can
> >> >the routines be split into 3 or 4 seperate pieces?  I'm asking this 
> >
> >> >because
> >> >no matter where I put it in my code, I always get a "range of 
> >relative
> >> >branch exceeded" from somewhere in the program.  If I can't split 
> >the 
> >> >code,
> >> >where should I put it?  Thanks for any help you can give me.
> >> >
> >> >James
> >> >
> >> 
> >
> >
> 


References: