Re: LZ: Well.
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: Well.
> > after nearly 8 years ( Windows 1.0 was released in 1989 ),
> people
> >are still
> > working out DLL implementation. :-D
I really doubt Windows 1.0 had any sort of dream of dlls since it was
just a fancy dos menu program. They came much later on. Besides, they
can't even get the Remember Password button to work in dial up
networking so I really wouldn't trust them to implement anything
successfully.
> >3) PSOII. Good idea. I'll be interested if I can see a beta.
> >
I for one would like to see a shell that supports relocation and is not
one standard. We need a small shell (cshell size) with relocation (but
not neccessarly libraries because there is no really need - slows down
stuff like pixel putting and the amount of compiled code reused is
really insignificant. I thank they are sometimes just crutches for less
expirenced people).
> >4) Poweruser v. mass-use shells. I have to agree that ZShell is
> still the
I don't really think that usgard is too complicated for anyone. I don't
think you can really call it a poweruser program or anything. It is a
poorly written, larger then neccesary and very buggy shell. Much more a
kin to Win95 then a powerful OS like Linux or os/2.
> Get Private Web-Based Email Free http://www.hotmail.com
Don't you just like those nice people at hotmail?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Geitgey
Partner CSRA Web Design and Computer Consulting
"Web Design for the Information Age"
PGP Key upon request
Email: csrawebtech@qualityservice.com
Web : http://csraweb.home.ml.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References: