Re: LZ: Extended mem. format
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Please remove me from this group and do not send any more mail. Thank you.
----------
> From: A.K.A. TheWiz <dankna@bergen.org>
> To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: LZ: Extended mem. format
> Date: Saturday, September 21, 1996 3:43 PM
>
> For future reference, all such posts are referring to "RAM Expander
> Beta", the plans for which can be found under "Plans & Guides" on
> ticalc.org...
>
> <SNIP>
> > No. Here are two practical solutions to extra memory for the calc...
> >
> > Passive. We interface a microwire eeprom (its three wires, clock, data
> > in, and data out. I believe its possible to combine the data in and
data
> > out using passive components, but well have to look into that). I Have
a
> > 500k-byte EEPROM with a microwire interface, if that isnt enough, they
> > have a 1-meg one you can buy. Basically we wire this to the link port,
> > and do the rest in software.
> >
> > Active. I like this one better, because you could add a lot more to it.
> > Basically, you take another microprocessor (Probably a Z80, since we
> > already know how to program it) We could hook it up so that if your
calc
> > got reset, you could program the thingy to automatically send a backup
> > to the calc if you did an input "cblget",blah or whatever on a cbl calc
> > and go to link receive or whatever. This way there could be variable
> > send/raw send/etc. The only problem is that i doubt if anyone has had
> > any experience working with microprocessors and stuff (Me Included, i
> > got the idea from my Z80 book). Wed at least need a microprocessor, rom
> > code, actually, would probably be eeprom that would be locked by a
> > special switch so that updates could be done without needing a burner.
> > Wed also need either static ram or eeprom, or both maybe. We could
leave
> > the scematics open-ended (same with the rom code) so that if someone
> > wanted to use eeprom for no-power storage, and static ram for fast
> > access, although it would be through the link port, so it would be
> > pretty slow. Anyway, i think the practically of this is limited by the
> > fact that it would be to big and bulky.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > p.s. To anyone that knows the ram+rom of the ti-85, is any of it
unused,
> > i wonder how hard it would be to tap the bus (wed only need maybe 16k
of
> > address space plus a free port or two for a page switcher. The problem
> > would be fitting all the crap in the case. oh well.
> >
>
>
> /***********************************
> * Daniel Knapp *
> * FeatherWate Software *
> * email: dankna@bergen.org *
> * *
> * Whose account this is, *
> * I think I know. *
> * The sysop is in Berkely, though. *
> * She will not see me typing here, *
> * To watch this Mac *
> * Refuse to go. *
> ***********************************/
>
>
References: