Re: LZ: More RAM


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: LZ: More RAM



-> > IN>He sure did.  The gist of it was "Nobody will ever need more
-> than 640K of > IN>memory."  And that's why we still have the 640K
-> barrier to this day. >
-> > IN>--timmyt
-> >
-> >
-> > I'm confused. 640k of what? It can't be RAM or hardrive. So what is
-> it?
-> Conventional RAM memory. A pain in the neck for us who use
-> DOS/Windows...


Well, not 95 or NT.


References: