Re: LZ: More RAM


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: LZ: More RAM



On  3 Sep 96 at 14:18, vikings@undergnd.metrobbs.com wrote:


> IN>He sure did.  The gist of it was "Nobody will ever need more than 640K of
> IN>memory."  And that's why we still have the 640K barrier to this day.
> 
> IN>--timmyt
> 
> 
> I'm confused. 640k of what? It can't be RAM or hardrive. So what is it?


Conventional RAM memory. A pain in the neck for us who use
DOS/Windows... 




Regards,


Mattias Lindqvist
CS student at LTH, Sweden
E-mail: d96mli@efd.lth.se


References: