[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

• To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Joe Pemberton" <joe@joepnet.com>
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:27:19 -0700
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <003901c361c2$5cd4b760$16fe8842@kcll>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

No.  Conditional jp's take 10/1 tstates.  Jp is always faster.

-----Original Message-----
From: assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org] On Behalf Of Matthew
Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:43 AM
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.



> That depends on whether or not the jump is taken, jr is 7/12 tstates
while
> jp is always 10.

Hmm... So, in an instance where it is more likely that a jump will not
be
taken, it is better to use jr.

MWM

• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "pad" <pad@OCF.Berkeley.EDU>

• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>

• Prev: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Next: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread