[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

• To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:43:43 -0500
• References: <000801c36115$47e1e560$16fe8842@kcll> <Law11-OE583CqUAynSq0001e4a8@hotmail.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

Thanks for the reply... but one of your statements gave me a little turmoil:

>  - relative jumps (jr) are smaller and faster than absolute jumps (jp).

WHAT!!!  I thought that jr took 12 cycles while jp took 10!  (Less if the
address is pointed to by a register, I think.)

MWM

• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: Martin <iemandiemand@xs4all.nl>
• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>

• [A83] Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>
• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Jeff" <telepath75@hotmail.com>

• Prev: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Next: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread