A83: Re: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A83: Re: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1



----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: Andreas
Aan: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Verzonden: zaterdag 26 februari 2000 12:35
Onderwerp: A83: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1

Dose any one know the differens between =he to rom calls mentioned below
_zeroop1 = 41c5h
_zerooop1 = 428eh
There is no such thing as a _zeroop1-romcall in the ti83 include file. By the way,
is '_zerooop1' a typo for the romcall that should have been named '_zeroop1'? I
mean, the third 'o' just doesn't seem to make sense to me.... What I do is equate
'_zeroop1' to the adress of '_zerooop1' in every program I write that uses it. Utterly
useless, but it just feels better :)
 
Arnout
arnout.engelen@beer.com

References: