Sv: Re: A83: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Sv: Re: A83: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1
Apparently I did mess up. Some time ago, in a source, I stumbled upon zeroop1. I looked it up in ion.inc and just assumed the ";" in front of it meant that the ti83 plus equate wasn't available. I didn't realize that it was in the ti83 plus section.
Sorry that I wasted your time.
Andreas Hjordt
----- Original Message -----
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: A83: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1
>
>
>
> In accordance with the prophecy, Andreas uttered:
>
> > Dose any one know the differens between the to rom calls mentioned below
> > _zeroop1 = 41c5h
> > _zerooop1 = 428eh
> >
> > Andreas Hjordt
> >
>
> A quick glance at the rom dumps says that 428eh (_zerooop1) will set OP1 to
> all zeroes, while 41c5h (_zeroop1) will simply do a 'ret'. Are you sure you
> got that address right?
>
> Linus
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra and then suddenly it
> flips over, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come."
> -- Matt Groening
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> lairfight@softhome.net, visit http://linusworld.cjb.net (PGP key available).
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: