RE: A83: Re: quick question about ti83plus
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A83: Re: quick question about ti83plus
If I read some docs correctly, in regular ASM 83+ programming, call can also
be used instead of bcall, maybe "jump _puts" would work...
Greets,
Peter Martijn
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:owner-assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org]Namens D Weiss
Verzonden: woensdag 13 december 2000 21:53
Aan: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Onderwerp: Re: A83: Re: quick question about ti83plus
I tried that, VTI crashed after I quit ion. I guess you can't do that
optimization.
>From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
>Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
>To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
>Subject: A83: Re: quick question about ti83plus
>Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:30:06 -0700
>
>
>Yes.
>
> > Can the code:
> > bcall(_puts)
> > ret
> >
> > be optimized to:
> > bjump(_puts)
> >
> > like on the regular 83?
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
_________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
____________________________________________________________
Get your free domain name and domain-based e-mail from
Namezero.com. New! Namezero Plus domains now available.
Find out more at: http://www.namezero.com
Follow-Ups:
References: