Re: A83: SOS v1.7... Basic?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A83: SOS v1.7... Basic?




Out of interest, Joe, how did you do it?

Thanks,

James.

==========================================
E-mail matthews@tkb.att.ne.jp              ICQ: 7413754
http://home.att.ne.jp/gold/tomcat21/index.html
http://hyperion.advanced.org/18242/
==========================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Wingbermuehle <joewing@usmo.com>
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, January 04, 1999 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: A83: SOS v1.7... Basic?


>
>I figured out how to run Basic programs such that they can call asm
>programs...
>Now is the Basic support good enough? If you want to try out the new SOS
let
>me know!
>
>Joe Wingbermuehle
>http://www.usmo.com/~joewing
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Wingbermuehle <joewing@usmo.com>
>To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, January 03, 1999 6:53 PM
>Subject: Re: A83: SOS v1.7... Basic?
>
>
>>
>>Yeah, that's not going to be too good is it...
>>Well, if I can figure out how to get rid of this memory leak.... but I
>don't
>>think I'm going to.
>>I really don't want to have two versions either...
>>Does anyone have the slightest idea how to have an asm program (prgmZSOS)
>>call a basic program (prgmBASIC) call an asm program (prgmZASM)? This is
>>without modifying a Basic program of course...
>>The problem is that the second asm program messes up the memory allocated
>by
>>the first asm program.
>>
>>Joe Wingbermuehle
>>http://www.usmo.com/~joewing
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jkhum98@aol.com <Jkhum98@aol.com>
>>To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Sunday, January 03, 1999 6:42 PM
>>Subject: Re: A83: SOS v1.7... Basic?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In a message dated 01/03/99 7:32:33 PM, joewing@usmo.com writes:
>>>
>>>>- the calculator will eat memory if the Basic program attempts to run
>>>>    an assembly language program (about 700 bytes, gone).
>>>
>>>Ouch, thats going to suck for this ASM Library I'm making for BASIC
users.
>>It
>>>uses the "Send(9" command so they can call my program with certain input
>>and
>>>it will do stuff that couldnt be done before in Basic...  If you have
>>>detection for the Basic functionality, and it causes that to happen, well
>I
>>>say drop that and just make two seperate versions... =P
>>> --Jason K.
>>>
>>
>
>
>