Re: A83: Re: Asm God???
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: Re: Asm God???
In accordance with the prophecy, Scott Dial uttered:
> All I got to say is, even if it was a coding mistake it could have
> occured from rewriting the routines and OH F***ING WELL IT IS ONE
> F***ING BYTE! and yes I obviously see other optimizations to be had but
> refer to the above statement and modify it some...
> Jimmy Conner wrote:
>>
>> --- Harper Maddox <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> How can you be sure that you this series is ,in
>>> fact, instruction opcodes
>>> and not the "coincidental" data segment.
Amen. Now, I don't think Bill Nagel is any asm god, some of his coding is
crappy and that is apparent even without disassembling any of it. I've heard
he was the/a ti-83 asm pioneer, and he deserves respect for that, but he's
not the best. _However_, he still shouldn't be judged by one fscking ret.
Linus
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There are three kinds of death in this world. There's heart death, there's
brain death, and there's being off the network."
-- Guy Almes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
lairfight@softhome.net, visit http://linusworld.cjb.net (PGP key available).
References: