Re: A83: Re: Re: Aghh Bug!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: Re: Re: Aghh Bug!
Yes, and your solution would probably work, but I started writing the code for
it and found it to be much larger than I wanted.... need I repeat myself when I
say it's not necessary anyway?
Joe Wingbermuehle
http://joewing.calc.org
----- Original Message -----
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 1999 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: A83: Re: Re: Aghh Bug!
>
> On 17-Apr-99, you wrote:
>
> > How do you fix this, though?
> > It seems such a strange concept...The order of loading being
> > important.
> > The symbol table will be different. But how does that matter...
> > Cant you add some sorting routine or somthing to fix this...
> > Yeh, probally a bit pointless....
>
> I don't like repeating myself, but I _have_ a solution to this problem, I
> _have_ presented it to Joe on this list, and the solution is to use
> _insertmem and _delmem when moving the program data back and forth. The
> symtab will be intact, you can use safe ram areas for buffering, everyone
> will be happy and peace on earth will arise. But this is ofcourse Joe's
> choice.
>
> Linus
> --
> wwww
> (o)(O)
> .--> .-------mm--(__)--mm--------.
> | Linus Akesson | http://linusworld.cjb.net |
> `---------------^-- ----- --- -- -- - - - `---------ooO--Ooo----------'
> Here I am. Now what are your other two wishes?
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: