Re: A83: Re: What to use

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A83: Re: What to use
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 22:05:59 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


The fact that you don't have to store the huge ZASMLOAD file on your calc to run your program. =)
And I think I heard that Joe was going to add password lock to some future version of SOS...  Big
advantages.  Another is that SOS can run the programs with a smaller amount of memory free.  Another
is that SOS can run programs for SOS/AShell, while Send(9prgmZwhatever cannot.

-Miles Raymond

-----Original Message-----
From: Velex <velex@geocities.com>
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, November 02, 1998 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: A83: Re: What to use


>
>David Phillips wrote:
>>
>> I personally would use a TI-83 or an emulator such as TI-8X emulator.  ;-)
>>
>> Not to start a flame war, but SOS seems to be the best and most supported
>> shell for the 83, especially considering it's still under development and to
>> my knowledge, AShell is not.  SOS will run all SOS and AShell programs, but
>> AShell will not run SOS programs.  Too bad you need a shell to efficiently
>> run asm on the 83...
>>
>
>I have a newbie question :) : What kind of advantage does SOS give the
>programmer/user over a normal Send(9prgmZWHTEVER line in prgmWHATEVER?
>
>--
>Adam Loutzenhiser, professional serf of West Ottawa High School
>[mailto:velex@geocities.com]  [ICQ: 17091343]
>[http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/2035/index.html]