Re: A82: Shell Analysis

To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A82: Shell Analysis
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:40:53 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-82-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <f4a1f253.35971851@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org


Cmutr@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 98-06-28 12:33:10 EDT, you write:
>
> <<
>  Hey dude, I'm not "mad" at you or anything. I'm just,
>  y'know, telling you what I think. Anyways, I think that
>  this should be a ticalc.org survey question:
>
>  "Are more assembly shells good or bad for a calculator?"
>
>  A) Good
>  B) Bad
>  C) Undecided/Don't care
>
>  Then we'd have a better idea of what everyone thinks of this, not just
>  people like me who talk a lot. :)
>
>                                                 -Kouri
>   >>
>
> BAD- we should have one so all programs can be run on it, and maybe make it
> work with add on components to suit everyones needs-then everyone can make the
> misc. components that can be added to it as .exe files that modify the
> program- like AOL upgrades (sort of)

Just what we need is an AOLer telling us to make TI shells like AOL's software. :)

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

References:

Re: A82: Shell Analysis

From: Cmutr@aol.com