Re: A82: Re: A83: thanx..more int info

To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A82: Re: A83: thanx..more int info
From: Matt Maurano <maurano@best.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 17:59:06 -0800
Organization: Whatzever
References: <971114203818_206159614@mrin41.mail.aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org

I don't think it would make a difference. Unless TI has a wrapper running only
over those assembly programs executed via Send(9, it wouldn't make a difference.
It is only a different way of getting into asm mode.

(So- did TI plan to have ASM support on the 83, or was it a bug/beta only feature
that was left in :)

GeradS711@AOL.COM wrote:

> Dines,
> You were talking about how it was impossible to get a decent ROM (RAM??) Dump
> off an 83. Since the way ASH executes is supported on all of the calcs, how
> hard would it be to make ASH for the 83 and get a rom dump so we could find
> out more about it?? Like where and what the ports are?
> Gerad

References:

A82: Re: A83: thanx..more int info

From: GeradS711@aol.com

Prev: Re: A82: Assembly programmers? where?
Next: A82: Doctor Livingstone I pResume
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread