Re: A82: Custom 82p File Designer...


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A82: Custom 82p File Designer...



Maybe it should be renamed fight-assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org....

-----Original Message-----
From: Dines Christy Justesen <c958362@student.dtu.dk>
To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 04, 1997 3:30 AM
Subject: Re: A82: Custom 82p File Designer...


>My point was that the numbers you used where way too big, not that you
>program was not faster than prgm82. When prgm82 was written we did not try
>to make it as fast as possible, so ofcorse it is possible to make a faster
>program.
>
>Dines
>
>BTW I visted your homepage yesterday, but most of the pages just gave an
>error (file not found).
>
>_______________________________________
>
>Dines Justesen
>Email: dines@post1.com or
>       c958362@student.dtu.dk
>WWW  : http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c958362/
>_______________________________________
>
>On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
>
>> At 04:24 PM 11/3/97 +0100, you wrote:
>> >on this list, or that you say it is better than prgm82, but please use
>> >realistic numbers. I also want to mention that i tried to convert a file
>> >which was 120k, and i took 6 secs.
>>
>> Okay, I retested it, and it took 15 seconds to run.  I still proved my
>> point that my program IS faster...I just tend to over-exaggerate
sometimes
>> :)  (you would too if you were tired and in a hurry).
>>
>> >Dines
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Thomas J. Hruska <thruska@tir.com>
>> >To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org>
>> >Date: 3. november 1997 04:13
>> >Subject: Re: A82: Custom 82p File Designer...
>> >
>> >
>> >>At 02:26 PM 11/2/97 -0800, you wrote:
>> >>>Thank God! I have been waiting for PRGM82 forever. It is just sooo
slow.
>> >If
>> >>>your thing is even .00124 seconds faster, multiplied by the 100 times
I
>> >have
>> >>>compiled something, you will save almost an entire second from my
life.
>> >Thank
>> >>>you sooo much! No more of those 2 second waits for prgrm82, everybody!
>> >>
>> >>Are you being sarcastic (for lack of a better word) with me?  Try
taking
>> >>the Dump82 program and test the obj->82p with PRGM82.  It will take
about
>> >>30 seconds to convert.  My program will be done in less than 1/10000 of
a
>> >>second.  Kurai's 24K RPG game for OS-82 would take about 2 minutes for
>> >>ASM82 while my program only takes 1/100 of a second.  So, ALL serious
82
>> >>ASM programmers (those who write large programs) will want this in
their
>> >>arsenal of tools.  You can go ahead and make fun of it.  However, I
will
>> >>bet that many other people will find this program to be very useful
>> >>(especially those who want to make shells and modular add-on
capabilities
>> >>to their programs or just because they want to test their program 2
min.
>> >>sooner than you do).
>>
>>                  Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
>> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"
>>          http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
>>                     http://shinelight.home.ml.org
>>
>