ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Archives :: News :: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released

AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
Posted by Eric on 7 June 2000, 23:51 GMT

Reno notified us that TI has recently released the new version of the TI-89/92+ internal software. The new version includes an increased RAM limit for ASM programs (8K to 24K), language improvements, and other enhancements. Download AMS v2.04 for the TI-89 and TI-92+.

Update (Nick): I will say this once and once only:
IF YOU PUT AMS V2.04 ON YOUR CALCULATOR, WE HOLD ABSOLUTELY NO RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY FUNCTIONALITY OF THE PROGRAMS YOU DOWNLOAD FROM THIS SITE. VERY FEW, IF ANY, ASSEMBLY PROGRAMS, WILL PROBABLY WORK. TI HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DECREASE COMPATIBILITY WITH EVERY SINGLE ROM VERSION AND THEIR "ENHANCEMENTS" USUALLY MEAN THAT ASSEMBLY PROGRAM LIMITATIONS HAVE BEEN PUT IN. DO NOT ASK US WHEN AUTHORS WILL PUT IN SUPPORT FOR V2.04: THAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHORS ALONE.
Thank you. :)

Update (Nathan): Okay, I know everyone's too lazy to do it themselves, so I'll just say that I upgraded to AMS 2.04, and DoorsOS II v0.96 installs, but doesn't work (Address error when trying to run Doors). Patrick Davidson informed us that Universal OS works perfectly under this crazy new AMS version, but only under hardware v1.00. So now you've been warned, and as usual, we don't want to hear about it if your programs don't work. Ask the authors, not us. Thank you. :)

Update Purple Monkey Dishwasher (Nick): I've gotten about six or seven emails that this ROM version in fact does transfer over successfully with a black link. Some people were, however, complaining about speed issues.

Double Update Action (Nick): Matt Baum gave me an email showing a brief list of programs and their functionality under this new AMS. It might be of help to some of you.

 


The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.


Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
S67  Account Info
(Web Page)

Incredible, TI is gearing up for summer: rom support of larger games.

     8 June 2000, 01:01 GMT


Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
JaggedFlame

Not games, I'm sure they just made some huge flash app that goes larger than 8KB and they don't feel like making it smaller...

     8 June 2000, 01:49 GMT


Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
Nick Disabato  Account Info
(Web Page)

Flash apps have no limit.
Assembly programs do.

--BlueCalx

     8 June 2000, 02:09 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
JaggedFlame

Hmm... that's interesting; I didn't know that. (Actually, isn't there a limit to the available memory? ;-)

But whatever it is, I'm sure it's not because of games... <g>

     8 June 2000, 04:11 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
Jeff Meister  Account Info

Hmm... no limits for TI's Applications ($$$), but limits for user made ASM progs! Three guesses why! :)

- Jeff

     8 June 2000, 23:03 GMT

Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
meekzer0  Account Info
(Web Page)

A word of caution:
TI's ROM upgrades usually mean you will not be able to play 80% of the games created for the older versions. If the squirrels living in your skull insist that you put the new ROM version on your calc, i suggest that you save your old version on your CPU. You can also get the old one from a friend if you heeded this too late.

--meek

     8 June 2000, 01:02 GMT


Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
BeautifulGeorge  Account Info

if you want an older ROM version, say 1.05, all you have to do is e-mail the friendly people at TI. they sent it to me after i upgraded to 2.03.

     16 June 2000, 23:11 GMT

Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
wigglychunks

is this a good thing or bad thing?

     8 June 2000, 01:09 GMT

Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
Joe Shang  Account Info
(Web Page)

ANYBODY KNOW HOW TO SEND V2.04 TO THE TI-89 USING A PARRALELL LINK CABLE?

     8 June 2000, 01:14 GMT

Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
Nick Disabato  Account Info
(Web Page)

Please don't type in ALL CAPS. It's regarded as "shouting" and generally looked on as obnoxious.

My only success with updating my calc's ROM was with the gray (~$50) link cable.
This is ironic because the black one is *newer* :p

--BlueCalx

     8 June 2000, 01:42 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
JaggedFlame

Yeah, besides, he's asked this question three times in the last hour. :-)

     8 June 2000, 01:50 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
JaggedFlame

Not last hour... I should have said "the last fifteen minutes."

     8 June 2000, 01:54 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
Elliot Olney  Account Info
(Web Page)

It doesn't work with that black link? wow, I have gotten it to ONLY work with my black link.

     8 June 2000, 23:43 GMT


Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
AuroraBoriales  Account Info

I recall hearing about one in the vast comments section of the article "AMS 2.03 released". This was in December of 1999, and Some guy keeps mentioning the use of the parallel link to send ROM versions

     8 June 2000, 05:16 GMT


Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
wigglychunks

??? O_o

     8 June 2000, 21:11 GMT

Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
mysteryegg  Account Info
(Web Page)

Anybody else notice how 2.03 won't convert temperature scales?

     8 June 2000, 01:26 GMT

Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
JaggedFlame

Use the tmpConv( command - it's in the manual.

     8 June 2000, 01:50 GMT


Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
skyraid

you don't have to rely that much on a calc... i don't think that there is a life or death situation where you have to convert C to F... and it's not that hard to remember that F = 9\5 * C + 32

- skyraid

     8 June 2000, 10:58 GMT


Re: Re: Re: AMS v2.04 for TI-89 and TI-92+ Released
JaggedFlame

Or you don't even have to do that much... Just remember 0C -> 32F and 100C -> 212F, and you can just create an equation from (0,32) and (100,212), if you don't remember the equation itself.

     9 June 2000, 03:12 GMT

Here we go again!
Tim Dorr  Account Info
(Web Page)

I'm glad I still have version 1.00. I had upgraded to 1.05, then 2.03. I was fortunate to have found someone with a 1.00 calc and prevented the hair from being removed from my head by my own hands!

BTW, STOP WITH THE FREAKIN' PARALLEL PORT!! IF ANYONE CARED, THEY WOULD HAVE ALREADY SAID SOMETHING!!!

     8 June 2000, 01:39 GMT

Re: Here we go again!
Patrick H
(Web Page)

1.00 S_U_C_K_S, lol r u livin in a cave or something?...

     8 June 2000, 03:03 GMT

Re: Re: Here we go again!
meekzer0  Account Info
(Web Page)

Nah. 1.00 is the best, actually. Most of the earlier games will not run on later versions, wheras almost all of the ones made for newer will run on 1.00. I had to 'trade' with an unwitting victim to get my 1.00 HW1.

-meek

     8 June 2000, 03:17 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Here we go again!
Patrick H
(Web Page)

and what descent games might those be??? there's nothing..........

     8 June 2000, 03:44 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Here we go again!
Amalfi Marini  Account Info

with ams 2.03 you'll get 702-384 = 318kb more of flash memory. I got HW1 calc. With doorsos 0.96, I use 450kb of flash memory : pretty working games and progs -impossible with ams 1.00- .


     8 June 2000, 06:10 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Here we go again!
Amalfi Marini  Account Info

oops , that's wrong (see my post a few metters below)

     8 June 2000, 06:33 GMT

Re: Re: Here we go again!
Nick Disabato  Account Info
(Web Page)

I run 1.00.
I have never, ever, ever had a problem playing anything, and I've loaded just about every game out there onto my 89.

Every game, of course, that we have in our archives. :P

You must be thinking of Windows 1.00 or DOS 1.00... *nothing* runs on those! Why, I was running DOS v1.00 the other day, and it gave me this:

C:\> dir
Syntax Error
C:\>

--BlueCalx

     8 June 2000, 05:23 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Here we go again!
David Phillips  Account Info
(Web Page)

Kind of funny you would write that. DOS 1 was quite similiar to CP/M. It didn't support directories nor hard drives :)

     9 June 2000, 01:29 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Here we go again!
llewellynn

Actually, it is "?Bad command or file not found" or similar. Source code for DOS 1.0 follows:

10 INPUT A$
20 PRINT "?Bad command or file not found"
30 GOTO 10

     9 June 2000, 01:41 GMT

Re: Re: Here we go again!
Jeff Meister  Account Info

No, I just like to have my calculator spend more time upwards doing math problems than face down while I'm attempting to take out the backup battery in school with a bent paper clip after it crashed for the millionth time.

- Jeff

     8 June 2000, 23:07 GMT


Re: Re: Here we go again!
MathJMendl  Account Info
(Web Page)

Funny that someone would say something that stupid. Looking at your homepage url, though, it makes more sense. Why do all the idiots of the world use aol?

     9 June 2000, 04:15 GMT

Re: Here we go again!
AuroraBoriales  Account Info

I used to have the parallel rom and flashappp sender, and it worked for me. I installed 2.03 and the list editor, it worked perfectly. Check the December article announcing that 2.03 is out.

     8 June 2000, 05:19 GMT


Re: Here we go again!
Hexalon

all you have to do is email ti and tell them that you are having trouble with the current rom and would like a old one instead and they will e-mail it to you.

     8 June 2000, 08:01 GMT

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer